EESTI PANK
GOVERNOR'S DECREE No 4
9 May 2008
Approval of TARGET2-Eesti rules
This decree shall be established based on Subsection 2(1) and Clause 14 3)
of the Eesti Pank Act and Subsection 87(2) of the Credit Institutions Act.
§ 1. This decree approves the "Harmonised conditions for participation in TARGET2-Eesti" (appended).
§ 2. This decree applies as of 19 May 2008.
Andres Lipstok
Governor
Appendix
to Eesti Pank Governor’s
Decree No 4 of 9 May 2008
‘Approval of TARGET2-Eesti” rules
HARMONISED CONDITIONS FOR PARTICIPATION IN TARGET2-EESTI
TITLE I
GENERAL PROVISIONS
Article 1 – Definitions
For the purposes of the harmonised conditions for participation in TARGET2-Eesti (hereinafter HC):
’addressable BIC holder’ means an entity which: (a) holds a Bank
Identifier Code (BIC); (b) is not recognised as an indirect participant; and
(c) is a correspondent or customer of a direct participant or a branch of a
direct or indirect participant, and is able to submit payment orders to and
receive payments from a TARGET2 component system via the direct participant;
’non-settled payment order’ means a payment order that is not settled
on the same business day as that on which it is accepted;
‘Settlement Finality Directive’ means Directive 98/26/EC of the
European Parliament and of the Council of 19 May 1998 on settlement finality
in payment and securities settlement systems;
‘public sector body’ means an entity within the ‘public sector’,
the latter term as defined in Article 3 of Council Regulation (EC) No 3603/93
of 13 December 1993 specifying definitions for the application of the prohibitions
referred to in Articles 104 and 104b(1) of the Treaty (now Articles 101 and
103(1));
‘CAI mode’ means the provision of consolidated account information
in relation to PM accounts via the ICM;
‘CAI group’ means a group composed of TARGET2 participants that
use the CAI mode;
‘CAI group manager’ means a CAI group member appointed by the other members of the CAI group to monitor and distribute the available liquidity within the CAI group during the business day;
‘Contingency Module’ means the SSP module enabling the processing
of critical and very critical payments in contingency situations;
‘Eurosystem’ means the ECB and the national central banks (NCBs)
of the Member States that have adopted the euro;
‘Eurosystem CB’ means the ECB or the NCB of a Member State that
has adopted the euro;
‘branch’ means a branch within the meaning of Subsection 11(1)
of the Credit Institutions Act;
‘ICM broadcast message’ means information made simultaneously available to all or a selected group of TARGET2 participants via the Information and Control Module (ICM);
‘investment firm’ means an investment firm within the meaning of
Subsection 40(1) of the Securities Market Act, excluding the institutions specified in Subsection 47(1) of the same act, provided that the investment firm in question is:
a) authorised and supervised by a recognised competent authority, which has
been designated as such under Directive 2004/39/EC; and
b) entitled to carry out the activities referred to under section 43 of the
Securities Market Act;
‘indirect participant’ means a credit institution established in
the European Economic Area (EEA), which has entered into an agreement with a
direct participant to submit payment orders and receive payments via such direct participant’s PM account, and which has been recognised by a TARGET2 component system as an indirect participant;
’central banks (CBs)’ means the Eurosystem CBs and the connected
CBs,
‘Home Account’ means an account opened outside the PM by a CB for
an entity that is eligible to become an indirect participant;
‘group’ means
a) a composition of credit institutions included in the consolidated financial
statements of a parent company where the parent company is obliged to present
consolidated financial statements under International Accounting Standard 27
(IAS 27), adopted pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2238/2004 and consisting of either:
i) a parent company and one or more subsidiaries; or
ii) two or more subsidiaries of a parent company; or
b) a composition of credit institutions as referred to in subparagraphs (a)(i)
or (ii), where a parent company does not present consolidated financial statements
in accordance with IAS 27, but may be able to satisfy the criteria defined in
IAS 27 for inclusion in consolidated financial statements, subject to the verification of the CB of the direct participant; or
c) a bilateral or multilateral network of credit institutions that is
i) organised through a statutory framework determining the affiliation of credit institutions to such a network; or
ii) characterised by self-organised mechanisms of cooperation (promoting, supporting and representing the business interests of its members) and/or economic solidarity going beyond the ordinary cooperation usual between credit institutions whereby such cooperation and solidarity are permitted by credit institutions’
by-laws or articles of incorporation or established by virtue of separate agreements;
and in each case referred to in (c) the ECB’s Governing Council has approved an application to be considered as constituting a group;
‘credit institution’ means a credit institution within the meaning
of Subsection 3(1) of the Credit Institutions Act that is subject to supervision by a competent authority;
‘credit transfer order’ means an instruction by a payer to make
funds available to a payee by means of a book entry on a PM account;
‘ancillary system (AS)’ means a system managed by an entity established
in the European Economic Area (EEA) that is subject to supervision and/or oversight by a competent authority, in which payments and/or financial instruments are exchanged and/or cleared while the resulting monetary obligations are settled in TARGET2 in accordance with Guideline ECB/2007/2 and a bilateral arrangement between the ancillary system and the relevant CB;
‘Ancillary System Interface (ASI)’ means the technical device allowing
an AS to use a range of special, predefined services for the submission and
settlement of AS payment instructions;
‘marginal lending facility’ means a Eurosystem standing facility
which counterparties may use to receive overnight credit from a Eurosystem CB
at the prespecified marginal lending rate;
‘marginal lending rate’ means the interest rate applicable to the
marginal lending facility;
‘liquidity transfer order’ means a payment order, the main purpose of which is to transfer liquidity between different accounts of the same participant or within a CAI group;
‘payee’ means a TARGET2 participant whose PM account will be credited as a result of a payment order being settled;
‘instructing participant’ means a TARGET2 participant that has
initiated a payment order;
‘payment order’ means a credit transfer order, a liquidity transfer order or a direct debit instruction;
‘insolvency proceedings’ means insolvency proceedings within the
meaning of Article 2(j) of the Settlement Finality Directive;
‘Payments Module (PM)’ means an SSP module in which payments of
TARGET2 participants are settled on PM accounts;
‘PM account’ means an account held by a TARGET2 participant in
the PM with a CB which is necessary for such TARGET2 participant to:
a) submit payment orders or receive payments via TARGET2; and
b) settle such payments with the respective CB;
‘payer’ means a TARGET2 participant whose PM account will be debited as a result of a payment order being settled;
‘participant’ (or ‘direct participant’) means an entity that holds at least one PM account with Eesti Pank;
‘Participant Interface (PI)’ means the technical device allowing
direct participants to submit and settle payment orders via the services offered in the PM;
‘direct debit instruction’ means an instruction from a payee submitted
to its CB pursuant to which the CB of the payer debits the payer’s account by the amount specified in the instruction, on the basis of a direct debit authorisation;
‘direct debit authorisation’ means a general instruction by a payer to its CB entitling and obliging that CB to debit the payer’s account upon a direct debit instruction from a payee;
‘Bank Identifier Code (BIC)’ means a code as defined by ISO Standard No 9362;
‘Banking Directive’ means Directive 2006/48/EC of the European
Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2006 relating to the taking up and
pursuit of the business of credit institutions (recast);
‘suspension’ means the temporary freezing of the rights and obligations
of a participant for a period of time to be determined by Eesti Pank;
‘event of default’ means any impending or existing event, the occurrence
of which may threaten the performance by a participant of its obligations under the HC or any other rules applying to the relationship between that participant and Eesti Pank or any other CB, including:
a) where the participant no longer meets the access criteria laid down in Article 4 or the requirements laid down in Article 8(1)(a)(i);
b) the opening of insolvency proceedings in relation to the participant;
c) the submission of an application relating to the proceedings referred to
in subparagraph (b);
d) the issue by the participant of a written declaration of its inability to
pay all or any part of its debts or to meet its obligations arising in relation to intraday credit;
e) the entry of the participant into a voluntary general agreement or arrangement with its creditors;
f) where the participant is, or is deemed by its CB to be, insolvent or unable
to pay its debts;
g) where the participant’s credit balance on its PM account or all or
a substantial part of the participant’s assets are subject to a freezing
order, attachment, seizure or any other procedure that is intended to protect
the public interest or the rights of the participant’s creditors;
h) where participation of the participant in another TARGET2 component system
and/or in an ancillary system has been suspended or terminated;
i) where any material representation or pre-contractual statement made by the
participant or which is implied to have been made by the participant under the
applicable law is incorrect or untrue; or
j) the assignment of all or a substantial part of the participant’s assets;
‘intraday credit’ means credit extended for a period of less than
one business day;
‘entry disposition’ means a payment processing phase during which
TARGET2-Eesti attempts to settle a payment order which has been accepted pursuant to Article 14, by means of specific procedures, as described in Article 20;
‘static data collection form’ means a form developed by Eesti Pank for the purpose of registering applicants for TARGET2-Eesti services and registering
any changes in relation to the provision of such services;
‘TARGET2’ means Trans-European Automated Real-time Gross Settlement Express Transfer System; the entirety resulting from all TARGET2 component systems of the CBs;
‘TARGET2 CUG’ means a subset of the network service provider’s customers grouped for the purpose of their use of the relevant services and
products of the network service provider when accessing the PM;
‘TARGET2 participant’ means any participant in any TARGET2 component system;
‘TARGET2 component system’ means any of the CBs’ real-time
gross settlement (RTGS) systems that form part of TARGET2;
‘technical malfunction of TARGET2’ means any difficulty, defect
or failure in the technical infrastructure and/or the computer systems used
by TARGET2-Eesti, or any other event that makes it impossible to execute and
complete the same-day processing of payments in TARGET2-Eesti or, during the
migration period, payments from national RTGS systems that have not yet migrated to TARGET2 and vice versa;
‘TARGET2-Eesti’ means the TARGET2 component system of Eesti Pank;
‘Information and Control Module (ICM)’ means the SSP module that
allows participants to obtain on-line information and gives them the possibility of submitting liquidity transfer orders, manage liquidity and initiate backup payment orders in contingency situations;
‘business day’ means any day on which TARGET2 is open for the settlement of payment orders, as set out in Appendix V;
‘available liquidity’ (or ‘liquidity’) means a credit
balance on a TARGET2 participant’s PM account and, if applicable, any
intraday credit line granted by the relevant CB in relation to such account;
‘network service provider’ means the undertaking appointed by the
ECB’s Governing Council to provide computerised network connections for
the purpose of submitting payment messages in TARGET2;
‘capacity opinion’ means a participant-specific opinion that contains
an assessment of a participant’s legal capacity to enter into and carry
out its obligations under the HC;
‘connected CB’ means a national central bank (NCB), other than
a Eurosystem CB, which is connected to TARGET2 pursuant to a specific agreement;
‘multi-addressee access’ means the facility by which branches or
credit institutions established in the EEA can access the relevant TARGET2 component system by submitting payment orders and/or receiving payments directly to and from the TARGET2 component system; this facility authorises these entities to
submit their payment orders through the direct participant’s PM account
without that participant’s involvement;
‘Single Shared Platform (SSP)’ means the single technical platform infrastructure provided by the SSP-providing CBs;
‘SSP-providing CBs’ means the Deutsche Bundesbank, the Banque de
France and the Banca d’Italia in their capacity as the CBs building and
operating the SSP for the Eurosystem’s benefit.
Article 2 – Appendices
(1) The following Appendices form an integral part of the HC:
Appendix I: Technical specifications for the processing of payment orders
Appendix II: TARGET2 compensation scheme
Appendix III: Terms of reference for capacity and country opinions
Appendix IV: Business continuity and contingency procedures
Appendix V: Operating schedule
Appendix VI: Fee schedule and invoicing
Appendix VII: Fee schedule and invoicing for ancillary systems using the Participant Interface
(2) In the event of any conflict or inconsistency between the content of any
appendix and the content of any other provision in the HC the latter shall prevail.
Article 3 – TARGET2-Eesti and general description of TARGET2-Eesti
(1) TARGET2 provides real-time gross settlement for payments in euro, with settlement in central bank money.
(2) The following payment orders are processed in TARGET2-Eesti:
(a) settlement of euro transfers resulting from transactions in cross-border
large-value netting systems;
(b) settlement of euro transfers resulting from transactions in euro retail
payment systems of systemic importance; and
(c) any other payment orders in euro addressed to TARGET2 participants.
(3) TARGET2 is established and functions on the basis of the SSP. The Eurosystem
specifies the SSP’s technical configuration and features. The SSP services are provided by the SSP-providing CBs for the benefit of the Eurosystem CBs, pursuant to separate agreements.
(4) Eesti Pank is the provider of services under the HC. Acts and omissions
of the SSP-providing CBs shall be considered acts and omissions of Eesti Pank
for which it shall assume liability in accordance with Article 31 of the HC.
Participation pursuant to the HC shall not create a contractual relationship
between participants and the SSP-providing CBs when the latter act in that capacity.
Instructions, messages or information which a participant receives from, or
sends to, the SSP in relation to the services provided under the HC are deemed
to be received from, or sent to, Eesti Pank.
(5) TARGET2 is legally structured as a multiplicity of payment systems composed of all the TARGET2 component systems, which are designated as ‘systems’
under the national laws implementing the Settlement Finality Directive. TARGET2-Eesti is designated as a ‘system’ under Subsection 87(3) of the Credit Institutions Act.
(6) Participation in TARGET2 takes effect via participation in a TARGET2 component
system. The HC describe the mutual rights and obligations of participants in
TARGET2-Eesti and Eesti Pank. The rules on the processing of payment orders
(Title IV) refer to all payment orders submitted or payments received by any
TARGET2 participant.
TITLE II
PARTICIPATION
Article 4 – Access criteria
(1) The following types of entities are eligible for direct participation in TARGET2-Eesti:
(a) credit institutions established in the EEA, including when they act through a branch established in the EEA;
(b) credit institutions established outside the EEA, provided that they act
through a branch established in the EEA; and
(c) NCBs of EU Member States and the ECB.
(2) Eesti Pank may, at its discretion, also admit the following entities as
direct participants:
(a) treasury departments of central or regional governments of Member States
active in the money markets;
(b) public sector bodies of Member States authorised to hold accounts for customers;
(c) investment firms established in the EEA;
(d) organisations providing clearing or settlement services that are established in the EEA and are subject to oversight by a competent authority; and
(e) credit institutions or any of the entities of the types listed under subparagraphs (a) to (d), in both cases where these are established in a country with which the European Community has entered into a monetary agreement allowing access
by any of such entities to payment systems in the European Community, subject
to the conditions set out in the monetary agreement and provided that the relevant legal regime applying in the country is equivalent to the relevant Community legislation.
(3) Electronic money institutions, within the meaning of Subsection 5(1) of
the Electronic Money Institutions Act, are not entitled to participate in TARGET2-Eesti.
Article 5 – Direct participants
(1) Direct participants in TARGET2-Eesti shall comply with the requirements
set out in Article 8(1) and (2). They shall have at least one PM account with
Eesti Pank.
(2) Direct participants may designate addressable BIC holders, regardless of their place of establishment.
(3) Direct participants may designate entities as indirect participants, provided that the conditions laid down in Article 6 are met.
(4) Multi-addressee access through branches may be provided as follows:
(a) a credit institution within the meaning of Article 4(1)(a) or (b), which
has been admitted as a direct participant, may grant access to its PM account
to one or more of its branches established in the EEA in order to submit payment orders and/or receive payments directly, provided that Eesti Pank has been informed accordingly;
(b) where a branch of a credit institution has been admitted as a direct participant, the other branches of the same legal entity and/or its head office, in both cases provided that they are established in the EEA, may access the branch’s PM account, provided that it has informed Eesti Pank.
Article 6 – Indirect participants
(1) Credit institutions established in the EEA may each enter into a contract with one direct participant that is either a credit institution within the meaning of Article 4(1)(a) or (b), or a CB, in order to submit payment orders and/or
receive payments, and to settle them via the PM account of that direct participant.
TARGET2-Eesti shall recognise indirect participants by registering such indirect participation in the TARGET2 directory, the latter as described in Article 9.
(2) Where a direct participant, which is a credit institution within the meaning of Article 4(1)(a) or (b), and an indirect participant belong to the same group,
the direct participant may expressly authorise the indirect participant to use
the direct participant’s PM account directly to submit payment orders
and/or receive payments by way of group-related multi-addressee access.
Article 7 – Direct participant’s responsibility
(1) For the avoidance of doubt, payment orders submitted or payments received
by indirect participants pursuant to Article 6, and by branches under Article
5(4), shall be deemed to have been submitted or received by the direct participant itself.
(2) The direct participant shall be bound by such payment orders, regardless
of the content of, or any non-compliance with, the contractual or other arrangements between that participant and any of the entities referred to in paragraph 1.
Article 8 – Application procedure
(1) To join TARGET2-Eesti, the applicant participants shall:
(a) fulfil the following technical requirements:
(i) install, manage, operate and monitor and ensure the security of the necessary
IT infrastructure to connect to TARGET2-Eesti and submit payment orders to it.
In doing so, applicant participants may involve third parties, but retain sole
liability. In particular, applicant participants shall enter into an agreement
with the network service provider to obtain the necessary connection and admissions,
in accordance with the technical specifications in Appendix I; and
(ii) have passed the tests required by Eesti Pank; and
(b) fulfil the following legal requirements:
(i) provide a capacity opinion in the form specified in Appendix III, unless
the information and representations to be provided in such capacity opinion
have already been obtained by Eesti Pank in another context; and
(ii) for the entities referred to in Article 4(1)(b), provide a country opinion
in the form specified in Appendix III, unless the information and representations
to be provided in such country opinion have already been obtained by Eesti Pank in another context.
(2) Applicants shall apply in writing to Eesti Pank as a minimum enclosing the following documents/information:
(a) completed static data collection forms as provided by Eesti Pank;
(b) the capacity opinion, if required by Eesti Pank and
(c) the country opinion, if required by Eesti Pank.
(3) Eesti Pank may also request any additional information it deems necessary to decide on the application to participate.
(4) Eesti Pank shall reject the application to participate if:
(a) access criteria referred to in Article 4 are not met;
(b) one or more of the participation criteria referred to in paragraph 1 are
not met; and/or
(c) in Eesti Pank’s assessment, such participation would endanger the
overall stability, soundness and safety of TARGET2-Eesti or of any other TARGET2 component system, or would jeopardise Eesti Pank’s performance of its tasks as described in the Eesti Pank Act and the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank.
(5) Eesti Pank shall communicate its decision on the application to participate
to the applicant within one month of Eesti Pank’s receipt of the application to participate. Where Eesti Pank requests additional information pursuant to paragraph 3, the decision shall be communicated within one month of Eesti Pank’s
receipt of this information from the applicant. Any rejection decision shall
contain reasons for the rejection.
Article 9 – TARGET2 directory
(1) The TARGET2 directory is the database of BICs used for the routing of payment orders addressed to:
(a) TARGET2 participants and their branches with multi-addressee access;
(b) indirect participants of TARGET2, including those with multi-addressee access;
and
(c) addressable BIC holders of TARGET2.
The directory shall be updated weekly.
(2) Unless otherwise requested by the participant, BICs shall be published in the TARGET2 directory.
(3) Participants may only distribute the TARGET2 directory to their branches and entities with multi-addressee access.
(4) Entities specified in paragraph 1(b) and (c) shall only use their BIC in relation to one direct participant.
TITLE III
OBLIGATIONS OF THE PARTIES
Article 10 – Obligations of Eesti Pank and the participants
(1) Eesti Pank shall offer the services described in Title IV. Save where otherwise provided in the HC or required by law, Eesti Pank shall use all reasonable means within its power to perform its obligations under the HC, without guaranteeing a result.
(2) Participants shall pay to Eesti Pank the fees laid down in Appendix VI.
(3) Participants shall ensure that they are connected to TARGET2-Eesti on business days, in accordance with the operating schedule in Appendix V.
(4) The participant represents and warrants to Eesti Pank that the performance
of its obligations under the HC does not breach any law, regulation or by-law
applicable to it or any agreement by which it is bound.
Article 11 – Cooperation and information exchange
(1) In performing their obligations and exercising their rights under the HC,
Eesti Pank and participants shall cooperate closely to ensure the stability,
soundness and safety of TARGET2-Eesti. They shall provide each other with any
information or documents relevant for the performance of their respective obligations
and the exercise of their respective rights under the HC, without prejudice
to any banking secrecy obligations.
(2) Eesti Pank shall establish and maintain a system support desk to assist
participants in relation to difficulties arising in connection with system operations.
(3) Up-to-date information on the SSP’s operational status shall be available
on the TARGET2 Information System (T2IS). The T2IS may be used to obtain information on any event affecting the normal operation of TARGET2.
(4) Eesti Pank may either communicate messages to participants by means of an ICM broadcast or by any other means of communication.
(5) Participants are responsible for the timely update of existing static data collection forms and the submission of new static data collection forms to Eesti Pank. Participants are responsible for verifying the accuracy of information relating to them that is entered into TARGET2-Eesti by Eesti Pank.
(6) Eesti Pank shall be deemed to be authorised to communicate to the SSP-providing CBs any information relating to participants which the SSP-providing CBs may need in their role as service administrators, in accordance with the contract entered into with the network service provider.
(7) Participants shall inform Eesti Pank about any change in their legal capacity
and relevant legislative changes affecting issues covered by the country opinion relating to them.
(8) Participants shall inform Eesti Pank of:
(a) any new indirect participant, addressable BIC holder or entity with multi-addressee
access which they register; and
(b) any changes to the entities listed in paragraph (a).
(9) Participants shall immediately inform Eesti Pank if an event of default
occurs in relation to them.
TITLE IV
MANAGEMENT OF PM ACCOUNTS AND PROCESSING OF PAYMENT ORDERS
Article 12 - Opening and management of PM accounts
(1) Eesti Pank shall open and operate at least one PM account and, if applicable, sub-accounts, for each participant.
(2) No debit balance shall be allowed on PM accounts.
(3) Interest is paid on PM accounts and their sub-accounts according to the
terms and conditions stipulated by Eesti Pank, but not above the ECB’s
deposit facility interest rate.
(4) In addition to the settlement of payment orders in the Payments Module,
a PM account may be used to settle payment orders to and from Home Accounts,
according to the rules laid down by Eesti Pank.
(5) Participants shall use the ICM to obtain information on their liquidity
position. Eesti Pank shall provide a daily statement of accounts to any participant that has opted for such service.
Article 13 – Types of payment orders
The following are classified as payment orders for the purposes of TARGET2:
(a) credit transfer orders;
(b) direct debit instructions carried out under a direct debit authorisation;
and
(c) liquidity transfer orders.
Article 14 – Acceptance and rejection of payment orders
(1) Payment orders submitted by participants are deemed accepted by Eesti Pank if:
(a) the payment message complies with the rules established by the network service provider;
(b) the payment message complies with the formatting rules and conditions of
TARGET2-Eesti and passes the double-entry check described in Appendix I; and
(c) in cases where a payer or a payee has been suspended, the suspended participant’s CB’s explicit consent has been obtained.
(2) Eesti Pank shall immediately reject any payment order that does not fulfil
the conditions laid down in paragraph 1. Eesti Pank shall inform the participant of any rejection of a payment order, as specified in Appendix I.
Article 15 – Priority rules
(1) Instructing participants shall designate every payment order as one of the following:
(a) normal payment order (priority class 2);
(b) urgent payment order (priority class 1); or
(c) highly urgent payment order (priority class 0).
If a payment order does not indicate the priority, it shall be treated as a
normal payment order.
(2) Highly urgent payment orders may only be designated by:
(a) CBs; and
(b) participants, in cases of payments to and from CLS International Bank and
liquidity transfers in favour of ancillary systems.
All payment instructions submitted by an ancillary system through the Ancillary System Interface to debit or credit the participants’ PM accounts shall be deemed to be highly urgent payment orders.
(3) In the case of urgent and normal payment orders, the payer may change the priority via the ICM with immediate effect. It shall not be possible to change the priority of a highly urgent payment.
Article 16 – Liquidity limits
(1) A participant may limit the use of available liquidity for payment orders
in relation to other TARGET2 participants, except any of the CBs, by setting
bilateral or multilateral limits. Such limits may only be set in relation to
normal payment orders.
(2) By setting a bilateral limit, a participant instructs Eesti Pank that an accepted payment order shall not be settled if the sum of its outgoing normal payment orders to another TARGET2 participant’s PM account minus the sum of all incoming urgent and normal payments from such TARGET2 participant’s PM account would exceed this bilateral limit.
(3) A participant may set a multilateral limit for any relationship that is
not subject to a bilateral limit. A multilateral limit may only be set if the
participant has set at least one bilateral limit. If a participant sets a multilateral limit, it instructs Eesti Pank that an accepted payment order shall not be settled if the sum of its outgoing normal payment orders to all TARGET2 participants’ PM accounts in relation to which no bilateral limit has been set, minus the sum of all incoming urgent and normal payments from such PM accounts would exceed this multilateral limit.
(4) The minimum amount of any of the limits shall be EUR 1 million. A bilateral
or a multilateral limit with an amount of zero shall be treated as if no limit
has been set. Limits between zero and EUR 1 million are not possible.
(5) Limits may be changed in real time with immediate effect or with effect
from the next business day via the ICM. If a limit is changed to zero, it shall not be possible to change it again on the same business day. The setting of a new bilateral or multilateral limit shall only be effective from the next
business day.
Article 17 – Liquidity reservation facilities
(1) Participants may reserve liquidity for highly urgent or urgent payment orders via the ICM.
(2) By requesting to reserve a certain amount of liquidity for highly urgent
payment orders, a participant instructs Eesti Pank only to settle urgent and
normal payment orders if there is available liquidity after the amount reserved
for highly urgent payment orders has been deducted.
(3) By requesting to reserve a certain amount of liquidity for urgent payment orders, a participant instructs Eesti Pank only to settle normal payment orders if there is available liquidity after the amount reserved for urgent and highly urgent payment orders has been deducted.
(4) After receipt of the reservation request Eesti Pank shall check whether
the amount of liquidity on the participant’s PM account is sufficient
for the reservation. If this is not the case, only the liquidity available on
the PM account shall be reserved. The rest of the requested liquidity reservation shall not be reserved automatically at any later point in time, even if the
amount of liquidity available on the participant’s PM account reaches
the level of the initial reservation request.
(5) The level of the liquidity reservation may be changed. Participants may
make a request via the ICM to reserve new amounts with immediate effect or with effect from the next business day.
Article 18 – Predetermined settlement times
(1) Instructing participants may predetermine the settlement time of the payment orders within a business day by using the Earliest Debit Time Indicator or the Latest Debit Time Indicator.
(2) When the Earliest Debit Time Indicator is used, the accepted payment order is stored and only entered into the entry disposition at the indicated time.
(3) When the Latest Debit Time Indicator is used, the accepted payment order shall be returned as non-settled if it cannot be settled by the indicated debit time. 15 minutes prior to the defined debit time, the instructing participant
shall be sent an automatic notification via the ICM. Instructing participant
may also use the Latest Debit Time Indicator solely as a warning indicator.
In such cases, the payment order concerned shall not be returned.
(4) Instructing participants can change the Earliest Debit Time Indicator and
the Latest Debit Time Indicator via the ICM.
(5) Further technical details are contained in Appendix I.
Article 19 – Payment orders submitted in advance
(1) Payment orders may be submitted up to five business days before the specified settlement date (warehoused payment orders).
(2) Warehoused payment orders shall be accepted and entered into the entry disposition on the date specified by the instructing participant at the start of daytime processing, as referred to in Appendix V. They shall be placed in front of payment orders of the same priority.
(3) Articles 15(3), 22(2) and 29(1)(a) shall apply mutatis mutandis to warehoused payment orders.
Article 20 – Settlement of payment orders in the entry disposition
(1) Unless instructing participants have indicated the settlement time in the manner described in Article 18, accepted payment orders shall be settled immediately or at the latest by the end of the business day on which they were accepted, provided that sufficient funds are available on the payer’s PM account and taking into account any liquidity limits and liquidity reservations as referred to in Articles 16 and 17.
(2) Funding may be provided by:
(a) the available liquidity on the PM account; or
(b) incoming payments from other TARGET2 participants, subject to the applicable optimisation procedures.
(3) For highly urgent payment orders the ‘first in, first out’ (FIFO) principle shall apply. This means that highly urgent payment orders shall be
settled in chronological order. Urgent and normal payment orders shall not be
settled for as long as highly urgent payment orders are queued.
(4) For urgent payment orders the FIFO principle shall also apply. Normal payment orders shall not be settled if urgent and highly urgent payment orders are queued.
(5) By derogation from paragraphs 3 and 4, payment orders with a lower priority (or of the same priority but accepted later) may be settled before payment orders with a higher priority (or of the same priority which were accepted earlier), if the payment orders with a lower priority would net out with payments to be received and result on balance in a liquidity increase for the payer.
(6) Normal payment orders shall be settled in accordance with the FIFO by-passing
principle. This means that they may be settled immediately (independently of
other queued normal payments accepted at an earlier time) and may therefore
breach the FIFO principle, provided that sufficient funds are available.
(7) Further details on the settlement of payment orders in the entry disposition are contained in Appendix I.
Article 21 – Settlement and return of queued payment orders
(1) Payment orders that are not settled immediately in the entry disposition shall be placed in the queues in accordance with the priority to which they were designated by the relevant participant, as referred to in Article 15.
(2) To optimise the settlement of queued payment orders, Eesti Pank may use
the optimisation procedures described in Appendix I.
(3) The payer may change the queue position of payment orders in a queue (i.e. reorder them) via the ICM. Payment orders may be moved either to the front or to the end of the respective queue with immediate effect at any time during daytime processing, as referred to in Appendix I.
(4) Liquidity transfer orders initiated in the ICM shall be immediately returned as non-settled if there is insufficient liquidity. Other payment orders shall be returned as non-settled if they cannot be settled by the cut-off times for the relevant message type, as specified in Appendix V.
Article 22 – Entry of payment orders into the system and their irrevocability
(1) For the purposes of the first sentence of Article 3(1) of the Settlement Finality Directive and Subsection 87(5) of the Credit Institutions Act, payment orders are deemed entered into TARGET2-Eesti at the moment that the relevant participant’s PM account is debited.
(2) Payment orders may be revoked until they are entered into TARGET2-Eesti
in accordance with paragraph 1. Payment orders that are included in an algorithm, as referred to in Appendix I, may not be revoked during the period that the algorithm is running.
TITLE V
LIQUIDITY POOLING
Article 23 – Liquidity pooling modes
Eesti Pank shall offer a consolidated account information (CAI) mode.
Article 24 – Consolidated account information mode
(1) The following may use the CAI mode:
(a) a credit institution and/or its branches (whether or not such entities participate
in the same TARGET2 component system), provided that the entities concerned
have several PM accounts identified by different BICs; or
(b) two or more credit institutions which belong to the same group and/or their
branches, each having one or more PM accounts identified by different BICs.
(2) (a) Under the CAI mode, each member of the CAI group and their respective
CBs are provided with the list of PM accounts of the group members and the following
additional information consolidated at the level of the CAI group:
i) intraday credit lines (if applicable);
ii) balances, including balances on sub-accounts;
iii) turnover;
iv) settled payments;
v) queued payment orders; and
vi) list of the PM accounts of the group members.
b) The CAI group manager and its respective CB shall have access to information
on each of the above items in relation to any PM account of the CAI group.
c) Information referred to in this paragraph is provided via the ICM.
(3) The CAI group manager shall be entitled to initiate liquidity transfers
via the ICM between the PM accounts, including their sub-accounts, forming part
of the same CAI group.
Article 25 – Request for authorisation to use the CAI mode
Each CAI group shall designate a CAI group manager. In the event that the CAI
group consists of only one participant, this participant shall act as the CAI
group manager. The TARGET2 participant that is the CAI group manager shall address
to the managing NCB a written request to use the CAI mode (containing the static
data collection form as provided by Eesti Pank). The remaining CAI group members
shall address their written requests (containing the static data collection
form as provided by Eesti Pank) to their respective CAI NCBs. The managing NCB
may request any additional information or document that it deems appropriate
in order to decide on the request.
Article 26 – Grant of authorisation to use the CAI mode
The managing NCB shall verify whether the applicants fulfil the requirements
to form a CAI group. To this end, the managing NCB may liaise with the other
CAI NCBs. The managing NCB’s decision shall be addressed, in writing,
to the CAI group manager within one month of receipt of the request referred
to in Article 25 by the managing NCB, or, if the managing NCB requests additional
information, within one month of receipt of such information by the managing
NCB. Any rejection decision shall contain reasons for the rejection.
TITLE VI
SECURITY REQUIREMENTS AND CONTINGENCY ISSUES
Article 27 – Business continuity and contingency procedures
In the event of an abnormal external event or any other event which affects
the operation of the SSP, the business continuity and contingency procedures
described in Appendix IV shall apply.
Article 28 – Security requirements
(1) Participants shall implement adequate security controls to protect their
systems from unauthorised access and use. Participants shall be exclusively
responsible for the adequate protection of the confidentiality, integrity and
availability of their systems.
(2) Participants shall inform Eesti Pank of any security-related incidents in
their technical infrastructure and, where appropriate, security-related incidents
that occur in the technical infrastructure of the third party providers. Eesti
Pank may request further information about the incident and, if necessary, request
that the participant take appropriate measures to prevent a recurrence of such
an event.
(3) Eesti Pank may impose additional security requirements on all participants
and/or on participants that are considered to significantly impact the operation
of TARGET2-Eesti by Eesti Pank.
TITLE VII
THE INFORMATION AND CONTROL MODULE
Article 29 – Use of the ICM
(1) The ICM:
a) allows participants to access information relating to their accounts and
to manage liquidity;
b) may be used to initiate liquidity transfer orders; and
c) allows participants to initiate backup lump sum and backup contingency payments
in the event of a failure of the participant’s payment infrastructure.
(2) Further technical details relating to the ICM are contained in Appendix
I.
TITLE VIII
COMPENSATION, LIABILITY REGIME AND EVIDENCE
Article 30 – Compensation scheme
If a payment order cannot be settled on the same business day on which it was
accepted due to a technical malfunction of TARGET2, Eesti Pank shall offer to
compensate the direct participants concerned in accordance with the special
procedure laid down in Appendix II.
Article 31 – Liability regime
(1) In performing their obligations pursuant to the HC, Eesti Pank and the participants
shall be bound by a general duty of reasonable care in relation to each other.
(2) Eesti Pank shall be liable to its participants in cases of fraud (including
but not limited to wilful misconduct) or gross negligence, for any loss arising
out of the operation of TARGET2-Eesti. In cases of ordinary negligence, Eesti
Pank’s liability shall be limited to the participant’s direct loss,
i.e. the amount of the transaction in question and/or the loss of interest thereon,
excluding any consequential loss.
(3) Eesti Pank is not liable for any loss that results from any malfunction
or failure in the technical infrastructure (including but not limited to Eesti
Pank’s computer infrastructure, programmes, data, applications or networks),
if such malfunction or failure arises in spite of Eesti Pank having adopted
those measures that are reasonably necessary to protect such infrastructure
against malfunction or failure, and to resolve the consequences of such malfunction
or failure (the latter including but not limited to initiating and completing
the business continuity and contingency procedures referred to in Appendix IV).
(4) Eesti Pank shall not be liable:
a) to the extent that the loss is caused by the participant; or
b) if the loss arises out of external events beyond Eesti Pank’s reasonable
control (force majeure).
(5) Notwithstanding the provisions governing settlements under the Law of Obligations
Act, paragraphs 1 to 4 shall apply to the extent that Eesti Pank’s liability
can be excluded.
(6) Eesti Pank and the participants shall take all reasonable and practicable
steps to mitigate any damage or loss referred to in this Article.
(7) In performing some or all of its obligations under the HC, Eesti Pank may
commission third parties in its own name, particularly telecommunications or
other network providers or other entities, if this is necessary to meet Eesti
Pank’s obligations or is standard market practice. Eesti Pank’s
obligation shall be limited to the due selection and commissioning of any such
third parties and Eesti Pank’s liability shall be limited accordingly.
For the purposes of this paragraph, the SSP-providing CBs shall not be considered
as third parties.
Article 32 – Evidence
(1) Unless otherwise provided in these HC, all payment and payment processing-related
messages in relation to TARGET2, such as confirmations of debits or credits,
or statement messages, between Eesti Pank and participants shall be made through
the network service provider.
(2) Electronic or written records of the messages retained by Eesti Pank or
by the network service provider shall be accepted as a means of evidence of
the payments processed through Eesti Pank. The saved or printed version of the
original message of the network service provider shall be accepted as a means
of evidence, regardless of the form of the original message.
(3) If a participant’s connection to the network service provider fails,
the participant shall use the alternative means of transmission of messages
laid down in Appendix IV. In such cases, the saved or printed version of the
message produced by Eesti Pank shall have the same evidential value as the original
message, regardless of its form.
(4) Eesti Pank shall keep complete records of payment orders submitted and payments
received by participants for a period of ten years from the year following the
year when such payment orders are submitted and payments are received, unless
a longer storage time is stipulated by law.
(5) Eesti Pank’s own books and records (whether kept on paper, microfilm,
microfiche, by electronic or magnetic recording, in any other mechanically reproducible
form or otherwise) shall be accepted as a means of evidence of any obligations
of the participants and of any facts and events that the parties rely on.
TITLE IX
TERMINATION OF PARTICIPATION AND CLOSURE OF ACCOUNTS
Article 33 – Duration and ordinary termination of participation
(1) Without prejudice to Article 34, participation in TARGET2-Eesti is for an
indefinite period of time.
(2) A participant may terminate its participation in TARGET2-Eesti at any time
giving 14 business days’ notice thereof, unless it agrees a shorter notice
period with Eesti Pank.
(3) Eesti Pank may terminate a participant’s participation in TARGET2-Eesti
at any time giving three months’ notice thereof, unless it agrees a different
notice period with that participant.
(4) On termination of participation, the confidentiality duties laid down in
Article 38 remain in force for a period of five years starting on the date of
termination.
(5) On termination of participation, the PM accounts of the participant concerned
shall be closed in accordance with Article 35.
Article 34 – Suspension and extraordinary termination of participation
(1) A participant’s participation in TARGET2-Eesti shall be immediately
terminated without prior notice or suspended if one of the following events
of default occurs:
a) the opening of insolvency proceedings; and/or
b) the participant no longer meets the access criteria laid down in Article
4.
(2) Eesti Pank may terminate without prior notice or suspend the participant’s
participation in TARGET2-Eesti if:
(a) one or more events of default (other than those referred to in paragraph
1) occur;
b) the participant is in material breach of the HC;
c) the participant fails to carry out any material obligation to Eesti Pank;
d) the participant is excluded from, or otherwise ceases to be a member of,
a TARGET2 CUG; and/or
e) any other participant-related event occurs which, in Eesti Pank’s
assessment, would threaten the overall stability, soundness and safety of TARGET2-Eesti
or of any other TARGET2 component system, or which would jeopardise Eesti Pank’s
performance of its tasks as described in the Eesti Pank Act and the Statute
of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank.
(3) In exercising its discretion under paragraph 2, Eesti Pank shall take into
account, inter alia, the seriousness of the event of default or events mentioned
in subparagraphs (a) to (c).
(4) a) In the event that Eesti Pank suspends or terminates a participant’s
participation in TARGET2-Eesti under paragraph 1 or 2, Eesti Pank shall immediately
inform that participant, other CBs and the other participants of such suspension
or termination by means of an ICM broadcast message.
b) In the event that Eesti Pank is informed by another CB of a suspension or
termination of a participant in another TARGET2 component system, Eesti Pank
shall immediately inform its participants of such suspension or termination
by means of an ICM broadcast message.
c) Once such an ICM broadcast message has been received by the participants,
the latter shall be deemed informed of the termination/suspension of a participant’s
participation in TARGET2-Eesti or another TARGET2 component system. The participants
shall bear any losses arising from the submission of a payment order to participants
whose participation has been suspended or terminated if such payment order was
entered into TARGET2-Eesti after receipt of the ICM broadcast message.
(5) Upon termination of a participant’s participation, TARGET2-Eesti shall
not accept any new payment orders from such participant. Payment orders in the
queue, warehoused payment orders or new payment orders in favour of such participant
shall be returned.
(6) If a participant is suspended from TARGET2-Eesti, all its incoming payments
and outgoing payment orders shall be stored and only entered into the entry
disposition after they have been explicitly accepted by the suspended participant’s
CB.
Article 35 – Closure of PM accounts
(1) Participants may close their PM accounts at any time provided they give
Eesti Pank 14 business days’ notice thereof.
(2) On termination of participation, pursuant to either Article 33 or 34, Eesti
Pank shall close the PM accounts of the participant concerned, after having:
a) settled or returned any queued payment orders; and
b) made use of its rights of pledge and set-off under Article 36.
TITLE X
FINAL PROVISIONS
Article 36 – Eesti Pank’s rights of pledge and set-off
(1) Eesti Pank shall have a pledge over the participant’s existing and
future credit balances on its PM accounts, thereby collateralising any current
and future claims arising out of the legal relationship between the parties.
Such collateral shall be established by the mere fact that the funds have been
credited to the participant’s PM account.
(2) Eesti Pank shall have the right referred to in paragraph 1 even if its claims
are only contingent or not yet due.
(3) The participant, acting in its capacity as a PM account holder, hereby acknowledges
the creation of a pledge in favour of Eesti Pank, with whom that account has
been opened; this acknowledgement shall constitute the provision of pledged
assets to Eesti Pank referred to under the Law of Property Act. Any amounts
paid into the PM account whose balance is pledged shall, by the mere fact of
being paid in, be irrevocably pledged, without any limitation whatsoever, as
collateral security for the full performance of the secured obligations.
(4) In the event of:
a) there occurs an event of default referred to in Article 34(1); or
b) any other participant-related event referred to in Article 34(2) has caused
the participant’s suspension or termination of participation in TARGET2-Eesti,
notwithstanding the commencement of any insolvency proceedings in respect of
a participant and notwithstanding any assignment, judicial or other attachment
or other disposition of or in respect of the participant’s rights, all
obligations of the participant shall be automatically and immediately accelerated,
without prior notice and without the need for any prior approval of any authority,
so as to be immediately due. In addition, the mutual obligations of the participant
and Eesti Pank shall automatically be set off against each other, and the party
owing the higher amount shall pay to the other the difference.
(5) Eesti Pank shall promptly give the participant notice of any set-off pursuant
to paragraph 4 after such set-off has taken place.
(6) Eesti Pank may without prior notice debit any participant’s PM account
by any amount which the participant owes Eesti Pank resulting from the legal
relationship between the participant and Eesti Pank.
Article 37 – Security rights in relation to funds on sub-accounts
(1) Eesti Pank shall have a pledge treated as financial collateral over the
balance on a participant’s sub-account opened for the settlement of AS-related
payment instructions under the arrangements between the relevant ancillary system
and its CB. Such balance shall collateralise the participant’s obligation
referred to in paragraph 7 towards Eesti Pank in relation to such settlement.
(2) Eesti Pank shall freeze the balance on the sub-account of the participant
upon communication by the ancillary system (via a ‘start-of-cycle’
message). Such freezing shall expire upon communication by the ancillary system
(via an ‘end-of-cycle’ message).
(3) By confirming the freezing of the balance on the participant’s sub-account,
Eesti Pank guarantees to the ancillary system payment up to the amount of this
particular balance. The guarantee shall be irrevocable, unconditional and payable
on first demand. If Eesti Pank is not the ancillary system’s CB, Eesti
Pank shall be deemed instructed to issue the abovementioned guarantee to the
ancillary system’s CB.
(4) In the absence of any insolvency proceedings in relation to the participant,
the AS-related payment instructions for the squaring of the participant’s
settlement obligation shall be settled without drawing on the guarantee and
without recourse to the security right over the balance on the participant’s
sub-account.
(5) In the event of the participant’s insolvency, the AS-related payment
instruction for the squaring of the participant’s settlement obligation
shall be a first demand for payment under the guarantee; the debiting of the
instructed amount from the participant’s sub-account (and crediting of
the AS’s technical account) shall therefore equally involve the discharge
of the guarantee obligation by Eesti Pank and a realisation of its collateral
right over the balance on the participant’s sub-account.
(6) The guarantee shall expire upon communication by the ancillary system that
the settlement has been completed (via an ‘end-of-cycle’ message).
(7) The participant shall be obliged to reimburse to Eesti Pank any payment
made by the latter under such guarantee.
Article 38 – Confidentiality
(1) Eesti Pank shall keep confidential all sensitive or secret information,
including when such information relates to payment, technical or organisational
information belonging to the participant or the participant’s customers,
unless the participant or its customer has given its written consent to disclose
or such disclosure is permitted or required under law.
(2) By derogation from paragraph 1, the participant agrees that Eesti Pank may
disclose payment, technical or organisational information regarding the participant
or the participant’s customers obtained in the course of the operation
of TARGET2-Eesti to other CBs or third parties that are involved in the operation
of TARGET2-Eesti, to the extent that this is necessary for the efficient functioning
of TARGET2, or to supervisory and oversight authorities of Member States and
the Community, to the extent that this is necessary for the performance of their
public tasks, and provided in all such cases that the disclosure is not in conflict
with the applicable law. Eesti Pank shall not be liable for the financial and
commercial consequences of such disclosure.
(3) By derogation from paragraph 1 and provided this does not make it possible,
whether directly or indirectly, to identify the participant or the participant’s
customers, Eesti Pank may use, disclose or publish payment information regarding
the participant or the participant’s customers for statistical, historical,
scientific or other purposes in the exercise of its public functions or of functions
of other public entities to whom the information is disclosed.
(4) Information relating to the operation of TARGET2-Eesti to which participants
have had access, may only be used for the purposes laid down in the HC. Participants
shall keep such information confidential, unless Eesti Pank has explicitly given
its written consent to disclose. Participants shall ensure that any third parties
to whom they outsource, delegate or subcontract tasks which have or may have
an impact on the performance of their obligations under the HC are bound by
the confidentiality requirements in this Article.
(5) Eesti Pank shall be authorised, in order to settle payment orders, to process
and transfer the necessary data to the network service provider.
Article 39 – Data protection, prevention of money laundering and related
issues
(1) Participants shall be deemed to be aware of, and shall comply with, all
obligations on them relating to legislation on data protection, prevention of
money laundering and the financing of terrorism, in particular in terms of implementing
appropriate measures concerning any payments debited or credited on their PM
accounts. Participants shall also acquaint themselves with the network service
provider’s data retrieval policy prior to entering into the contractual
relationship with the network service provider.
(2) Participants shall be deemed to have authorised Eesti Pank to obtain any
information relating to them from any financial or supervisory authority or
trade body, whether national or foreign, if such information is necessary for
the participant’s participation in TARGET2-Eesti.
Article 40 – Notices
(1) Except where otherwise provided for in the HC, all notices required or permitted
pursuant to the HC shall be sent by registered post, facsimile or otherwise
in writing or by an authenticated message through the network service provider.
Notices to Eesti Pank shall be submitted to Head of the Clearing and Settlement
Department of Eesti Pank (address: Estonia pst 13, Tallinn) or to the SWIFT
address EPBEEE2XTGT. Notices to the participant shall be sent to it at the address,
fax number or its SWIFT address as the participant may from time to time notify
to Eesti Pank.
(2) To prove that a notice has been sent, it shall be sufficient to prove that
the notice was delivered to the relevant address or that the envelope containing
such notice was properly addressed and posted.
(3) All notices shall be given in Estonian and/or English.
(4) Participants shall be bound by all forms and documents of Eesti Pank that
the participants have filled in and/or signed, including but not limited to
static data collection forms, as referred to in Article 8(2)(a), and information
provided under Article 11(5), which were submitted in compliance with paragraphs
1 and 2 and which Eesti Pank reasonably believes to have received from the participants,
their employees or agents.
Article 41 – Contractual relationship with network service provider
(1) For the purposes of the HC, the network service provider is SWIFT. Each
participant shall enter into a separate agreement with SWIFT regarding the services
to be provided by SWIFT in relation to the participant’s use of TARGET2-Eesti.
The legal relationship between a participant and SWIFT shall be exclusively
governed by SWIFT’s terms and conditions.
(2) Each participant shall also participate in a TARGET2 CUG, as specified by
the SSP-providing CBs acting as the SWIFT service administrator for the SSP.
Admission and exclusion of a participant to or from a TARGET2 CUG shall take
effect once communicated to SWIFT by the SWIFT service administrator.
(3) Participants shall comply with the TARGET2 SWIFT Service Profile, as made
available by Eesti Pank.
(4) The services to be provided by SWIFT shall not form part of the services
to be performed by Eesti Pank in respect of TARGET2.
(5) Eesti Pank shall not be liable for any acts, errors or omissions of SWIFT
(including its directors, staff and subcontractors) as provider of SWIFT services,
or for any acts, errors or omissions of network providers selected by participants
to gain access to the SWIFT network.
Article 42 – Amendment procedure
Eesti Pank may at any time unilaterally amend the HC, including its Appendices.
Amendments to the HC, including its Appendices, shall be announced in writing
or in a format that can be reproduced in writing. Amendments shall be deemed
to have been accepted unless the participant expressly objects within 14 days
of being informed of such amendments. In the event that a participant objects
to the amendment, Eesti Pank is entitled immediately to terminate that participant’s
participation in TARGET2-Eesti and close any of its PM accounts.
Article 43 – Third party rights
(1) Any rights, interests, obligations, responsibilities and claims arising
from or relating to the HC shall not be transferred, pledged or assigned by
participants to any third party without Eesti Pank’s written consent.
(2) These HC do not create any rights in favour of or obligations in relation
to any entity other than Eesti Pank and participants in TARGET2-Eesti.
Article 44 – Governing law, jurisdiction and place of performance
(1) The bilateral relationship between Eesti Pank and participants in TARGET2-Eesti
shall be governed by the Estonian legislation,
(2) Without prejudice to the competence of the Court of Justice of the European
Communities, any dispute arising from a matter relating to the relationship
referred to in paragraph 1 falls under the exclusive competence of the competent
courts of Estonia.
(3) The place of performance concerning the legal relationship between Eesti
Pank and the participants shall be the place of the seat of Eesti Pank.
Article 45 - Severability
If any provision in the HC is or becomes invalid, this shall not prejudice the
applicability of all the other provisions of the HC.
Article 46 – Binding nature
By participating in TARGET2-Eesti, participants automatically agree to the HC
between themselves and in relation to Eesti Pank
Appendix I
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE PROCESSING OF PAYMENT ORDERS
In addition to the Harmonised Conditions, the following rules shall apply to
the processing of payment orders:
1. Technical requirements for participation in TARGET2-Eesti regarding infrastructure,
network and formats
(1) TARGET2 uses SWIFT services for the exchange of messages. Each participant
therefore needs a connection to SWIFT’s Secure IP Network (SIPN). Each
participant’s PM account shall be identified by an eight- or 11-digit
BIC. Furthermore, each participant shall pass a series of tests to prove its
technical and operational competence before it may participate in TARGET2-Eesti.
(2) For the submission of payment orders and the exchange of payment messages
in the PM the SWIFTNet FIN Y-copy service shall be used. A dedicated SWIFT Closed
User Group (CUG) shall be set up for this purpose. Payment orders within such
TARGET2 CUG shall be directly addressed to the receiving TARGET2 participant
by entering its BIC in the header of the SWIFTNet FIN message.
(3) For the information and control services the following SWIFTNet services
may be used:
a) SWIFTNet InterAct;
b) SWIFTNet FileAct; and/or
c) SWIFTNet Browse.
(4) The security of the message exchange between participants shall rely exclusively
on SWIFT’s Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) service. Information on the
PKI service is available in the documentation provided by SWIFT.
(5) The ‘bilateral relationship management’ service provided by
SWIFT’s Relationship Management Application (RMA) shall only be used with
the central destination BIC of the SSP and not for payment messages between
TARGET2 participants.
2. Payment message types
(1) The following SWIFTNet FIN/SWIFT system message types are processed:
| Message type |
Type of use |
Description |
| MT 103 |
Mandatory |
Customer payment |
| MT 103+ |
Mandatory |
Customer payment (Straight Through Processing) |
| MT 202 |
Mandatory |
Bank-to-bank payment |
| MT 204 |
Optional |
Direct debit payment |
| MT 011 |
Optional |
Delivery notification |
| MT 012 |
Optional |
Sender notification |
| MT 019 |
Mandatory |
Abort notification |
| MT 900 |
Optional |
Confirmation of debit |
| MT 910 |
Optional |
Confirmation of credit |
| MT 940/950 |
Optional |
(Customer) statement message |
MT 011, MT 012 and MT 019 are SWIFT system messages.
(2) When they register with TARGET2-Eesti, direct participants shall declare
which optional message types they will use, with the exception of MT 011 and
MT 012 messages in relation to which direct participants shall decide from time
to time whether or not to receive them with reference to specific messages.
(3) Participants shall comply with the SWIFT message structure and field specifications,
as defined in the SWIFT documentation and under the restrictions set out for
TARGET2, as described in Chapter 9.1.2.2 of the User Detailed Functional Specifications
(UDFS), Book 1.
(4) Field contents shall be validated at the level of TARGET2-Eesti in accordance
with the UDFS requirements. Participants may agree among each other on specific
rules regarding the field contents. However, in TARGET2-Eesti there shall be
no specific checks as to whether participants comply with any such rules.
3. Double-entry check
1) All payment orders shall pass a double-entry check, the aim of which is to
reject payment orders that have been submitted more than once by mistake.
2) The following fields of the SWIFT message types shall be checked:
| Details |
Part of the SWIFT message |
Field |
| Sender |
Basic Header |
LT Address |
| Message Type |
Application Header |
Message Type |
| Receiver |
Application Header |
Destination Address |
| Transaction reference number, TRN |
Text Block |
:20 |
| Related Reference |
Text Block |
:21 |
| Value date |
Text Block |
:32 |
| Amount |
Text Block |
:32 |
3) If all the fields described in subparagraph 2 in relation to a newly submitted
payment order are identical to those in relation to a payment order that has
already been accepted, the newly submitted payment order shall be returned.
4. Error codes
If a payment order is rejected, the instructing participant shall receive an
abort notification (MT 019) indicating the reason for the rejection by using
error codes. The error codes are defined in Chapter 9.4.2 of the UDFS.
5. Predetermined settlement times
1) For payment orders using the Earliest Debit Time Indicator, the codeword
‘/FROTIME/’shall be used.
2) For payment orders using the Latest Debit Time Indicator, two options shall
be available:
a) codeword ‘/REJTIME/’: if the payment order cannot be settled
by the indicated debit time, the payment order shall be returned.
b) codeword ‘/TILTIME/’: if the payment order cannot be settled
by the indicated debit time, the payment order shall not be returned but shall
be kept in the relevant queue.
Under both options, if a payment order with a Latest Debit Time Indicator is
not settled 15 minutes prior to the time indicated therein, a notification shall
automatically be sent via the ICM.
3) If the codeword ‘/CLSTIME/’ is used, the payment shall be treated
in the same way as a payment order referred to in subparagraph 2(b).
6. Settlement of payment orders in the entry disposition
1) Offsetting checks and, if appropriate, extended offsetting checks (both terms
as defined in paragraphs 2 and 3) shall be carried out on payment orders entered
into the entry disposition to provide quick, liquidity-saving gross settlement
of payment orders.
2) An offsetting check shall determine whether the payee’s payment orders
that are at the front of the highly urgent or, if inapplicable, the urgent queue
are available to be offset against the payer’s payment order (hereinafter
‘offsetting payment orders’). If an offsetting payment order does
not provide sufficient funds for the respective payer’s payment order
in the entry disposition, it shall be determined whether there is sufficient
available liquidity on the payer’s PM account.
3) If the offsetting check fails, Eesti Pank may apply an extended offsetting
check. An extended offsetting check determines whether offsetting payment orders
are available in any of the payee’s queues regardless of when they joined
the queue. However, if in the queue of the payee there are higher priority payment
orders addressed to other TARGET2 participants, the FIFO principle may only
be breached if settling such an offsetting payment order would result in a liquidity
increase for the payee.
7. Settlement of payment orders in the queue
1) The treatment of payment orders placed in queues depends on the priority
class to which it was designated by the instructing participant.
2) Payment orders in the highly urgent and urgent queues shall be settled by
using the offsetting checks described in paragraph 6, starting with the payment
order at the front of the queue in cases where there is an increase in liquidity
or there is an intervention at queue level (change of queue position, settlement
time or priority, or revocation of the payment order).
3) Payments orders in the normal queue shall be settled on a continuous basis
including all highly urgent and urgent payment orders that have not yet been
settled. Different optimisation mechanisms (algorithms) are used. If an algorithm
is successful, the included payment orders will be settled; if an algorithm
fails, the included payment orders will remain in the queue. Three algorithms
(1 to 3) shall be applied to offset payment flows. By means of Algorithm 4,
settlement procedure 5 (as defined in Chapter 2.8.1 of the UDFS) shall be available
for the settlement of payment instructions of ancillary systems. To optimise
the settlement of highly urgent ancillary system transactions on participants’
sub-accounts, a special algorithm (Algorithm 5) shall be used.
a) Under Algorithm 1 (‘all-or-nothing‘) Eesti Pank shall, both
for each relationship in respect of which a bilateral limit has been set and
also for the total sum of relationships for which a multilateral limit has been
set:
i) calculate the overall liquidity position of each TARGET2 participant’s
PM account by establishing whether the aggregate of all outgoing and incoming
payment orders pending in the queue is negative or positive and, if it is negative,
check whether it exceeds that participant’s available liquidity (the overall
liquidity position shall constitute the ‘total liquidity position’);
and
ii) check whether limits and reservations set by each TARGET2 participant in
relation to each relevant PM account are respected.
If the outcome of these calculations and checks is positive for each relevant
PM account, Eesti Pank and other CBs involved shall settle all payments simultaneously
on the PM accounts of the TARGET2 participants concerned.
b) Under Algorithm 2 (‘partial’) Eesti Pank shall:
(i) calculate and check the liquidity positions, limits and reservations of
each relevant PM account as under Algorithm 1; and
(ii) if the total liquidity position of one or more relevant PM accounts is
negative, extract single payment orders until the total liquidity position of
each relevant PM account is positive.
Thereafter, Eesti Pank and the other CBs involved shall, provided there are
sufficient funds, settle all remaining payments (except the extracted payment
orders) simultaneously on the PM accounts of the TARGET2 participants concerned.
When extracting payment orders, Eesti Pank shall start from the TARGET2 participant’s
PM account with the highest negative total liquidity position and from the payment
order at the end of the queue with the lowest priority. The selection process
shall only run for a short time, to be determined by Eesti Pank at its discretion.
c) Under Algorithm 3 (‘multiple’) Eesti Pank shall:
i) compare pairs of TARGET2 participants’ PM accounts to determine whether
queued payment orders can be settled within the available liquidity of the two
TARGET2 participants’ PM accounts concerned and within the limits set
by them (by starting from the pair of PM accounts with the smallest difference
between the payment orders addressed to each other), and the CB(s) involved
shall book those payments simultaneously on the two TARGET2 participants’
PM accounts; and
ii) if, in relation to a pair of PM accounts as described under point (i), liquidity
is insufficient to fund the bilateral position, extract single payment orders
until there is sufficient liquidity. In this case the CB(s) involved shall settle
the remaining payments, except the extracted ones, simultaneously on the two
TARGET2 participants’ PM accounts.
After performing the checks specified under subparagraphs (i) to (ii), Eesti
Pank shall check the multilateral settlement positions (between a participant’s
PM account and other TARGET2 participants’ PM accounts in relation to
which a multilateral limit has been set). For this purpose, the procedure described
under subparagraphs (i) to (ii) shall apply mutatis mutandis.
d) Under Algorithm 4 (‘partial plus ancillary system settlement’)
Eesti Pank shall follow the same procedure as for Algorithm 2, but without extracting
payment orders in relation to the settlement of an ancillary system (which settles
on a simultaneous multilateral basis).
e) Under Algorithm 5 (‘ancillary system settlement via sub-accounts’)
Eesti Pank shall follow the same procedure as for Algorithm 1, subject to the
modification that Eesti Pank shall start Algorithm 5 via the Ancillary System
Interface and shall only check whether sufficient funds are available on participants’
sub-accounts. Moreover, no limits and reservations shall be taken into account.
Algorithm 5 shall also run during night-time settlement.
4) Payment orders entered into the entry disposition after the start of any
of algorithms 1 to 4 may nevertheless be settled immediately in the entry disposition
if the positions and limits of the TARGET2 participants’ PM accounts concerned
are compatible with both the settlement of these payment orders and the settlement
of payment orders in the current optimisation procedure. However, two algorithms
shall not run simultaneously.
5) During daytime processing the algorithms shall run sequentially. As long
as there is no pending simultaneous multilateral settlement of an ancillary
system, the sequence shall be as follows:
a) algorithm 1,
b) if algorithm 1 fails, then algorithm 2,
c) if algorithm 2 fails, then algorithm 3, or if algorithm 2 succeeds, repeat
algorithm 1.
When simultaneous multilateral settlement (‘procedure 5’) in relation
to an ancillary system is pending, Algorithm 4 shall run.
6) The algorithms shall run flexibly by setting a pre-defined time lag between
the application of different algorithms to ensure a minimum interval between
the running of two algorithms. The time sequence shall be automatically controlled.
Manual intervention shall be possible.
7) While included in a running algorithm, a payment order shall not be reordered
(change of the position in a queue) or revoked. Requests for reordering or revocation
of a payment order shall be queued until the algorithm is complete. If the payment
order concerned is settled while the algorithm is running, any request to reorder
or revoke shall be rejected. If the payment order is not settled, the participant’s
requests shall be taken into account immediately.
8. Use of the ICM
1) The ICM may be used for obtaining information and managing liquidity. SWIFT’s
Secure IP Network (SIPN) shall be the underlying technical communications network
for exchanging information and running control measures.
2) With the exception of warehoused payment orders and static data information,
only data in relation to the current business day shall be available via the
ICM. The screens shall be offered in English only.
3) Information shall be provided in ‘pull’ mode, which means that
each participant has to ask to be provided with information.
4) The following modes shall be available for using the ICM:
a) application-to-application mode (A2A)
In A2A, information and messages are transferred between the PM and the participant’s
internal application. The participant therefore has to ensure that an appropriate
application is available for the exchange of XML messages (requests and responses)
with the ICM via a standardised interface. Further details are contained in
the ICM User Handbook and in Book 4 of the UDFS.
b) user-to-application mode (U2A)
U2A permits direct communication between a participant and the ICM. The information
is displayed in a browser running on a PC system (SWIFT Alliance WebStation).
For U2A access through the SWIFT Alliance WebStation the IT infrastructure has
to be able to support cookies and JavaScript. Further details are described
in the ICM User Handbook.
5) Each participant shall have at least one SWIFT Alliance WebStation to have
access to the ICM via U2A.
6) Access rights to the ICM shall be granted by using SWIFT’s ‘Role
Based Access Control’. The SWIFT ‘Non Repudiation of Emission’
(NRE) service, which may be used by participants, allows the recipient of an
XML message to prove that such message has not been altered.
7) If a participant has technical problems and is unable to submit any payment
order, it may generate preformatted backup lump sum and backup contingency payments
by using the ICM. Eesti Pank shall open such functionality upon request of the
participant.
8) Participants may also use the ICM to transfer liquidity:
a) from their PM account to their account outside the PM;
b) between the PM account and the participant’s sub-accounts; and
c) from the PM account to the mirror account managed by the ancillary system.
9. The UDFS and the ICM User Handbook
Further details and examples explaining the above rules are contained in the
UDFS and the ICM User Handbook, as amended from time to time and published on
Eesti Pank’s website and the ECB’s website in English.
Appendix II
TARGET2 COMPENSATION SCHEME
1. General principles
a) If there is a technical malfunction of TARGET2, direct participants may
submit claims for compensation in accordance with the TARGET2 compensation scheme
laid down in this Appendix.
b) Unless otherwise decided by the ECB’s Governing Council, the TARGET2
compensation scheme shall not apply if the technical malfunction of TARGET2
arises out of external events beyond the reasonable control of the CBs concerned
or as a result of acts or omissions by third parties.
c) Compensation under the TARGET2 compensation scheme shall be the only compensation
procedure offered in the event of a technical malfunction of TARGET2. Participants
may, however, use other legal means to claim for losses. If a participant accepts
a compensation offer under the TARGET2 compensation scheme, this shall constitute
the participant’s irrevocable agreement that it thereby waives all claims
in relation to the payment orders concerning which it accepts compensation (including
any claims for consequential loss) it may have against any CB, and that the
receipt by it of the corresponding compensation payment constitutes full and
final settlement of all such claims. The participant shall indemnify the CBs
concerned, up to a maximum of the amount received under the TARGET2 compensation
scheme, in respect of any further claims which are raised by any other participant
or any other third party in relation to the payment order or payment concerned.
d) The making of a compensation offer shall not constitute an admission of
liability by Eesti Pank or any other CB in respect of a technical malfunction
of TARGET2.
2. Conditions for compensation offers
a) A payer may submit a claim for an administration fee and interest compensation
if, due to a technical malfunction of TARGET2:
i) a payment order was not settled on the business day on which it was accepted;
or
ii) during the migration period a payer can show that it intended to submit
a payment order to TARGET2-Eesti, but was unable to do so due to the stop-sending
status of a national RTGS system that had not yet migrated to TARGET2.
b) A payee may submit a claim for an administration fee if due to a technical
malfunction of TARGET2 it did not receive a payment that it was expecting to
receive on a particular business day. The payee may also submit a claim for
interest compensation if one or more of the following conditions are met:
i) in the case of participants that have access to the marginal lending facility:
due to a technical malfunction of TARGET2, a payee had recourse to the marginal
lending facility; and/or
ii) in the case of all participants: it was technically impossible to have recourse
to the money market or such refinancing was impossible on other, objectively
reasonable grounds.
3. Calculation of compensation
a) With respect to a compensation offer for a payer:
(i) the administration fee shall be EUR 50 for the first non-settled payment
order, EUR 25 for each of the next four such payment orders and EUR 12,50 for
each further such payment order. The administration fee shall be calculated
separately in relation to each payee;
(ii) interest compensation shall be determined by applying a reference rate
to be fixed from day to day. This reference rate shall be the lower of the euro
overnight index average (EONIA) rate and the marginal lending rate. The reference
rate shall be applied to the amount of the payment order not settled as a result
of the technical malfunction of TARGET2 for each day in the period from the
date of the actual or, in relation to payment orders referred to in paragraph
2(a)(ii), intended submission of the payment order until the date on which the
payment order was or could have been successfully settled. Any proceeds made
by placing funds resulting from non-settled payment orders on deposit with the
Eurosystem shall be deducted from the amount of any compensation; and
(iii) no interest compensation shall be payable if and in so far as funds resulting
from non-settled payment orders were placed in the market or used to fulfil
minimum reserve requirements.
b) With respect to a compensation offer for a payee:
(i) the administration fee shall be EUR 50 for the first non-settled payment
order, EUR 25 for each of the next four such payment orders and EUR 12,50 for
each further such payment order. The administration fee shall be calculated
separately in relation to each payee;
(ii) the method set out in subparagraph (a)(ii) for calculating interest compensation
shall apply except that interest compensation shall be payable at a rate equal
to the difference between the marginal lending rate and the reference rate,
and shall be calculated on the amount of any recourse to the marginal lending
facility occurring as a result of the technical malfunction of TARGET2.
4. Procedural rules
a) A claim for compensation shall be submitted on the claim form available
on the website of Eesti Pank in English (see www.bankofestonia.info). Payers
shall submit a separate claim form in respect of each payee and payees shall
submit a separate claim form in respect of each payer. Sufficient additional
information and documents shall be provided to support the information indicated
in the claim form. Only one claim may be submitted in relation to a specific
payment or payment order.
b) Within four weeks of a technical malfunction of TARGET2, participants shall
submit their claim form(s) to Eesti Pank. Any additional information and evidence
requested by Eesti Pank shall be supplied within two weeks of such request being
made.
c) Eesti Pank shall review the claims and forward them to the ECB. Unless otherwise
decided by the ECB’s Governing Council and communicated to the participants,
all received claims shall be assessed no later than 14 weeks after the technical
malfunction of TARGET2 occurs.
d) Eesti Pank shall communicate the result of the assessment referred to in
subparagraph (c) to the relevant participants. . If the assessment entails a
compensation offer, the participants concerned shall, within four weeks of the
communication of such offer, either accept or reject it, in respect of each
payment or payment order comprised within each claim, by signing a standard
letter of acceptance in the form available on the website of Eesti Pank (see
www.bankofestonia.info). If such letter has not been received by Eesti Pank
within four weeks, the participants concerned shall be deemed to have rejected
the compensation offer.
e) Eesti Pank shall make compensation payments on receipt of a TARGET participant’s
letter of acceptance of compensation. No interest shall be payable on any compensation
payment.
Appendix III
TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR CAPACITY AND COUNTRY OPINIONS
Terms of reference for capacity opinions for participants in TARGET2-Eesti
Eesti Pank
Estonia pst 13
15095
Estonia
[place], [date]
Dear Sir or Madam,
We have been asked to provide this Opinion as [in-house or external] legal
advisers to [specify name of Participant, name of Applicant in TARGET2-Eesti
or their branch] in respect of issues arising under the laws of [jurisdiction
in which the Participant is established] (hereinafter the ‘jurisdiction’)
in connection with the participation of [specify name of Participant] (hereinafter
the ‘Participant’) in TARGET2-Eesti (hereinafter the ‘System’).
This Opinion is confined to the laws of [jurisdiction] as they exist as on
the date of this Opinion. We have made no investigation of the laws of any other
jurisdiction as a basis for this Opinion, and do not express or imply any opinion
in this regard. Each of the statements and opinions presented below applies
with equal accuracy and validity under the laws of [jurisdiction], whether or
not the Participant acts through its head office or one or more branches established
inside or outside of [jurisdiction] in submitting payment orders and receiving
payments.
I. DOCUMENTS EXAMINED
For the purposes of this Opinion, we have examined:
1) a certified copy of the [specify relevant constitutional document(s)] of
the Participant such as is/are in effect on the date hereof;
2) [if applicable] an extract from the [specify relevant company register] and
[if applicable] [register of credit institutions or analogous register];
3) [to the extent applicable] a copy of the Participant’s licence or other
proof of authorisation to provide banking, investment, funds transfer or other
financial services in [jurisdiction];
4) [if applicable] a copy of a resolution adopted by the board of directors
or the relevant governing body of the Participant on [insert date], [insert
year], evidencing the Participant’s agreement to adhere to the System
Documents, as defined below;
5) [specify all powers of attorney and other documents constituting or evidencing
the requisite power of the person or persons signing the relevant System Documents
(as defined below) on behalf of the Participant] and all other documents relating
to the Participant’s constitution, powers, and authorisations necessary
or appropriate for the provision of this Opinion (hereinafter the ‘Participant
Documents’).
For the purposes of this Opinion, we have also examined:
1) Eesti Pank Governor’s Decree “Approval of TARGET2-Eesti rules’
together with its Appendices (hereinafter ‘the Rules’).
2) The Accession Agreement to TARGET2-Eesti concluded between Eesti Pank and
the participant for access to TARGET2-Eesti (hereinafter the ‘Accession
Agreement’) and other documents governing the System and/or relationships
between the Participant and other System Participants and relationships between
the System Participants and Eesti Pank.
The Rules and the Accession Agreement shall be referred to hereinafter as the
‘System Documents’ (and collectively with the Participant Documents
as the ‘Documents’).
II. ASSUMPTIONS
For the purposes of this Opinion we have assumed in relation to the Documents that:
1) the System Documents with which we have been provided are originals or true
copies;
2) the terms of the System Documents and the rights and obligations created
by them are valid and legally binding under the laws of Estonia by which they
are expressed to be governed, and the choice of the laws of Estonia to govern
the System Documents is recognised by the laws of Estonia;
3) the Participant Documents are within the capacity and power of and have been
validly authorised, adopted or executed and, where necessary, delivered by the
relevant parties;
4) the Participant Documents are binding on the parties to which they are addressed,
and there has been no breach of any of their terms.
III. OPINIONS REGARDING THE PARTICIPANT
A. The Participant is a corporation duly established and registered or otherwise
duly incorporated or organised under the laws of [jurisdiction].
B. The Participant has all the requisite corporate powers to execute and perform
the rights and obligations under the System Documents to which it is party.
C. The adoption or execution and the performance by the Participant of the rights
and obligations under the System Documents to which the Participant is party
will not in any way breach any provision of the laws or regulations of [jurisdiction]
applicable to the Participant or the Participant Documents.
D. No additional authorisations, approvals, consents, filings, registrations,
notarisations or other certifications of or with any court or governmental,
judicial or public authority that is competent in [jurisdiction] are required
by the Participant in connection with the adoption, validity of enforceability
of any of the System Documents or the execution or performance of the rights
and obligations thereunder.
E. The Participant has taken all necessary corporate action and other steps
necessary under the laws of [jurisdiction] to ensure that its obligations under
the System Documents are legal, valid and binding.
This Opinion is stated as of its date and is addressed solely to Eesti Pank
and [the Participant]. No other persons may rely on this Opinion, and the contents
of this Opinion may not be disclosed to persons other than its intended recipients
and their legal counsel without our prior written consent, with the exception
of the European Central Bank and the national central banks of the European
System of Central Banks and the [[jurisdiction] [NCB/relevant administrative
authorities].
Yours faithfully,
[signature]
Terms of reference for country opinions for non-EEA participants in TARGET2-Eesti
Eesti Pank
Estonia pst 13
15095
Estonia
[place], [date]
Dear Sir or Madam,
We have been asked as [external] legal advisers to [specify name of Participant,
name of Applicant in TARGET2-Eesti or their branch] (hereinafter the ‘Participant’)
in respect of issues arising under the laws of [jurisdiction in which the Participant
is established] (hereinafter the ‘jurisdiction’) to provide this
Opinion under the laws of [jurisdiction] in connection with the participation
of the Participant in TARGET2-Eesti (hereinafter the ‘System’).
References herein to the laws of [jurisdiction] include all applicable regulations
of [jurisdiction]. We express an opinion herein under the law of [jurisdiction],
with particular regard to the Participant established outside EEA in relation
to rights and obligations arising from participation in the System, as presented
in the System Documents defined below.
This Opinion is confined to the laws of [jurisdiction] as they exist on the
date of this Opinion. We have made no investigation of the laws of any other
jurisdiction as a basis for this Opinion, and do not express or imply any opinion
in this regard. We have assumed that there is nothing in the laws of another
jurisdiction which affects this Opinion.
1. DOCUMENTS EXAMINED
For the purposes of this Opinion, we have examined the documents listed below
and such other documents as we have deemed necessary or appropriate.
1) Eesti Pank Governor’s Decree “Approval of TARGET2-Eesti rules’
together with its Appendices (hereinafter ‘the Rules’).
2) The Accession Agreement to TARGET2-Eesti concluded between Eesti Pank and
the participant for access to TARGET2-eesti (hereinafter the ‘Accession
Agreement’) and other documents governing the System, relationships between
the Participant and other System Participants and relationships between the
System Participants and Eesti Pank.
The Rules and the documents listed in Clause 2 shall be referred to hereinafter
as the ‘System Documents’.
2. ASSUMPTIONS
For the purposes of this Opinion we have assumed in relation to the System Documents that:
1) the System Documents are within the capacity and power of and have been validly
authorised, adopted or executed and, where necessary, delivered by the relevant parties;
2) the terms of the System Documents and the rights and obligations created
by them are valid and legally binding under the laws of Estonia, by which they
are expressed to be governed, and the choice of the laws of Estonia to govern
the System Documents is recognised by the laws of Estonia;
3) the participants in the System through which any payment orders are sent
or payments are received, or through which any rights or obligations under the
System Documents are executed or performed, are licensed to provide funds transfer services, in all relevant jurisdictions;
4) the documents submitted to us in copy or as specimens conform to the originals.
3. OPINION
Based on and subject to the foregoing, and subject in each case to the points set out below, we are of the opinion that:
3.1 Country-specific legal aspects [to the extent applicable]
The following characteristics of the legislation of [jurisdiction] are consistent
with and in no way set aside the obligations of the Participant arising out
of the System Documents: [list of country-specific legal aspects].
3.2 General insolvency issues
3.2.a Types of insolvency proceedings
The only types of insolvency proceedings (including composition or rehabilitation)
– which, for the purpose of this Opinion, shall include all proceedings
in respect of the Participant’s assets or any branch it may have in [jurisdiction]
– to which the Participant may become subject in [jurisdiction], are the
following: [list proceedings in original language and English translation] (together
collectively referred to as ‘Insolvency Proceedings’).
In addition to Insolvency Proceedings, the Participant, any of its assets, or
any branch it may have in [jurisdiction] may become subject in [jurisdiction]
to [list any applicable moratorium, receivership, or any other proceedings as
a result of which payments to and/or from the Participant may be suspended,
or limitations can be imposed in relation to such payments, or similar proceedings
in original language and English translation] (hereinafter collectively referred
to as ‘Proceedings’).
3.2.b Insolvency treaties
[jurisdiction] or certain political subdivisions within [jurisdiction], as specified,
is/are party to the following insolvency treaties: [specify, if applicable which have or may have an impact on this Opinion].
3.3 Enforceability of System Documents
Subject to the points set out below, all provisions of the System Documents
will be binding and enforceable in accordance with their terms under the laws
of [jurisdiction], in particular in the event of the opening of any Insolvency
Proceedings or Proceedings with respect to the Participant.
In particular, we are of the opinion that:
3.3.a Processing of payment orders
The provisions on processing of payment orders of the Harmonised conditions
for participation in TARGET2-Eesti (hereinafter HC) are valid and enforceable.
In particular, all payment orders processed pursuant to such sections will be
valid, binding and will be enforceable under the laws of [jurisdiction]. Section
22 of the HC which specifies the precise point in time at which payment orders
submitted by the Participant to the System become enforceable and irrevocable
is valid, binding and enforceable under the laws of [jurisdiction].
3.3.b Authority of Eesti Pank to perform its functions
The opening of Insolvency Proceedings or Proceedings in respect of the Participant
will not affect the authority and powers of Eesti Pank arising out of the System
Documents. [Specify [to the extent applicable] that: the same opinion is also
applicable in respect of any other entity which provides the Participants with
services directly and necessarily required for participating in the System (e.g. network service provider).]
3.3.c Remedies in the event of default
Where applicable to the Participant, the provisions contained in the Rules regarding
accelerated performance of claims which have not yet matured, the set-off of
claims for using the deposits of the Participant, the enforcement of a pledge,
suspension and termination of participation, claims for default interest, and
termination of agreements and transactions are valid and enforceable under the
laws of [jurisdiction].
3.3.d Suspension and termination
Where applicable to the Participant, the provisions contained in the HC (in
respect of suspension and termination of the Participant’s participation
in the System on the opening of Insolvency Proceedings or Proceedings or other
events of default, as defined in the System Documents, or if the Participant
represents any kind of systemic risk or has serious operational problems) are
valid and enforceable under the laws of [jurisdiction].
3.3.e Penalty regime
Where applicable to the Participant, the provisions contained in the Rules in
respect of penalties imposed on a Participant which is unable to reimburse intraday
credit or overnight credit, where applicable, on time are valid and enforceable
under the laws of [jurisdiction].
3.3.f Assignment of rights and obligations
The rights and obligations of the Participant cannot be assigned, altered or
otherwise transferred by the Participant to third parties without the prior
written consent of Eesti Pank.
3.3.g Choice of governing law and jurisdiction
The provisions contained in the HC, and in particular in respect of the governing
law, the resolution of a dispute, competent courts, and service of process are
valid and enforceable under the laws of [jurisdiction].
3.4 Voidable preferences
We are of the opinion that no obligation arising out of the System Documents,
the performance thereof, or compliance therewith prior to the opening of any
Insolvency Proceedings or Proceedings in respect of the Participant may be set
aside in any such proceedings as a preference, voidable transaction or otherwise
under the laws of [jurisdiction].
In particular, and without limitation to the foregoing, we express this opinion
in respect of any payment orders submitted by any participant in the System.
In particular, we are of the opinion that the provisions of HC establishing
the enforceability and irrevocability of payment orders will be valid and enforceable
and that a payment order submitted by any participant and processed pursuant
to HC may not be set aside in any Insolvency Proceedings or Proceedings as a
preference, voidable transaction or otherwise under the laws of [jurisdiction].
3.5 Attachment
If a creditor of the Participant seeks an attachment order (including any freezing
order, order for seizure or any other public or private law procedure that is
intended to protect the public interest or the rights of the Participant’s
creditors) – hereinafter referred to as an ‘Attachment’ –
under the laws of [jurisdiction] from a court or governmental, judicial or public
authority that is competent in [jurisdiction], we are of the opinion that [insert
the analysis and discussion].
3.6 Collateral
3.6.a Assignment of rights or deposit of assets for collateral purposes, pledge, repo and/or guarantee
Assignments for collateral purposes will be valid and enforceable under the
laws of [jurisdiction]. Specifically, the creation and enforcement of a pledge
or repo under the [insert reference to the relevant arrangement with the CB]
will be valid and enforceable under the laws of [jurisdiction]. In the event
that a guarantee from another legal entity is required for adherence of the
Participant in the System, this guarantee will be binding on the guarantor and
fully enforceable against it, without any limit with regard to the amount of
the guarantee, whatever the Participant’s situation.
3.6.b Priority of assignees’, pledgees’ or repo purchasers’
interest over that of other claimants
In the event of Insolvency Proceedings or Proceedings in respect of the Participant,
the rights or assets assigned for collateral purposes, or pledged by the Participant
in favour of Eesti Pank or other participants in the System, will rank in priority
of payment above the claims of all other creditors of the Participant and will
not be subject to priority or preferential creditors.
3.6.c Enforcing title to security
Even in the event of Insolvency Proceedings or Proceedings in respect of the
Participant, other participants in the System and Eesti Pank [as assignees,
pledgees or repo purchasers as applicable] will still be free to enforce and
collect the Participant’s rights or assets through the action of Eesti
Pank pursuant to the Rules.
3.6.d Form and registration requirements
There are no form requirements for the assignment for collateral purposes of,
or the creation and enforcement of a pledge or repo over the Participant’s
rights or assets and it is not necessary for the [assignment for collateral
purposes, pledge or repo, as applicable], or any particulars of such [assignment,
pledge or repo, as applicable,] to be registered or filed with any court or
governmental, judicial or public authority that is competent in [jurisdiction].
3.7 Branches [to the extent applicable]
3.7.a Opinion applies to action through branches
Each of the statements and opinions presented above with regard to the Participant
applies with equal accuracy and validity under the laws of [jurisdiction] in
situations where the Participant acts through its one or more of its branches
established outside [jurisdiction].
3.7.b Conformity with law
Neither the execution and performance of the rights and obligations under the
System Documents nor the submission, transmission or receipt of payment orders
by a branch of the Participant will in any respect breach the laws of [jurisdiction].
3.7.c Required authorisations
Neither the execution and performance of the rights and obligations under the
System Documents nor the submission, transmission or receipt of payment orders
by a branch of a Participant will require any additional authorisations, approvals,
consents, filings, registrations, notarisations or other certifications of or
with any court or governmental, judicial or public authority that is competent
in [jurisdiction].
This Opinion is stated as of its date and is addressed solely to Eesti Pank
and [the Participant]. No other persons may rely on this Opinion, and the contents
of this Opinion may not be disclosed to persons other than its intended recipients
and their legal counsel without our prior written consent, with the exception
of the European Central Bank and the national central banks of the European
System of Central Banks and the [[jurisdiction] [NCB/rel |