| Frontpage » Publications » Publication series » Working Papers » 3/2012 » Merike Kukk, Dmitry Kulikov, Karsten Staehr. Consumption Sensitivities in Estonia: Income Shocks of Different Persistence |
|
|
The Permanent Income Hypothesis (PIH) entails that consumption
reacts more strongly to persistent than to temporary income shocks.
This prediction is tested using data from the Estonian Household Budget
Surveys for 2002-2007. The dataset contains questions which make
it possible to distinguish between persistent and temporary income
shocks based on the households' own assessment. The estimations confirm
that the marginal propensities to consume out of the two income
shocks differ, households are forward-looking and seek to smooth consumption.
Moreover, the estimated propensities of persistent shocks are
of reasonable magnitudes, consistent with the PIH. Further analysis
reveals, however, features that are in breach of the PIH. The consumption
estimations are affected by lagged temporary income shocks.
When income shocks are decomposed into positive and negative
values, there is evidence of excess sensitivity to positive temporary
shocks.
Author's e-mail address: karsten.staehr@eestipank.ee, karsten.staehr@tseba.ttu.ee The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of Eesti Pank. Contents
Consumption Sensitivities in Estonia: Income Shocks of Different Persistence , Working Papers of Eesti Pank No 3/2012 (PDF) |